Ch.7 Conflict
Today I came back from taking Eiken 1st-grade level, which was my major conflict of the day. It does not mean I did poorly on it, but it was stressful and nerve-wracking. I really hope I passed this time since it is my second time taking it; I was 4 points away from the passing line last time. I really abhor the "interview section" of listening comprehension.
Anyway, Ch.7 is about conflict. Up to this chapter, the relationship among Shackleton and his crew was fairly amicable while confronting several difficulties. However, there were actually internal struggles in
Endurance that led the party to a danger of devastation. I was surprised to know that Shackleton was known to have a quick temper in the first place, since he has been acting in the completely opposite way: calm, serene and peaceful. During the conflict, he not only managed to calm himself down but also worked to help his crew to find the solution. In any particular organizations or groups, conflict is inevitable; therefore, even if it is impossible to eliminate, it is still possible to turn that incident into an opportunity that helps strengthen bonds among members even more. Thinking optimistically is the key. There is a proverb that states, "After a storm comes a calm."
Another interesting point elucidated by Perkins is "Engage Dissidents". We tend to ignore the opinions of those who disagree with the idea in any types of meetings, conversations or arguments, but in fact, voices from dissidents are actually much more important than those from supporters. Dissidents are ones who point out flaws, mistakes or problems in the idea. By taking in advices, improvements are made and it gets brushed up. As Ken brought up in his entry, I really liked the idea of Shackleton inviting dissidents into the tent. In this way, at least they would not feel neglected and the best consequence would be reconciliation. True leaders give members equal opportunities to have a contact with their leaders.
This chapter reminded me of Oda Nobunaga, one of the great shonguns in Edo period. Although he was a strong leader and was about to unify the country, he got betrayed by his subordinate, Akechi Mitsuhide. There has been a number of theories why he betrayed, but one assumption is that Oda did not treat Akechi well and that made him desire to unify the country in place of Oda. If Oda Nobunaga used the same strategy as that of Shackleton, history might have been different.